Lovecraft Trolling

 After reading Arthur Machen's "The Great God Pan" I think I have a better understanding of Lovecraft and the new character I've been working on. There are plenty of other sources I need to read before I'm ready to proceed so I should get to work on that. In the meantime, I wanted to make a note about the "trolling" Lovecraft does in his works. I noticed a similar approach in Machen's stories that leaves the horror in the imagination of the reader's mind. Anything the mind can imagine will be infinately better than what can be described on paper. My issue is that there doesn't seem to be enough to build a solid image out of the terror. Machen and Lovecraft like to give us hints about their monsters without providing concrete descriptions. Cthulhu, the most iconic creature in Lovecraft's work, is described in the story as "a mountain moved." We've given the size of Cthulhu but not the image. Only Lovecraft's own sketch of Cthulhu is the reason we have that image of a tentacled head with the prehensile wings. Machen does the same with the description of what happens to Pan's victims and hints at the end about a larger pantheon that could destroy humanity. 

So is Lovecraft trolling us by making us guess the rest of the story? We, like the protagonists, only have a glimpse of the full scope of horror. But the moment that horror is explained the mystery and the fun disappears. It's the curse of the vague. "Less is more" as the cornerstone of the story, also becomes the burden because the writer can never truely reveal their thoughts about the monster or risk ruining the fun behind it. It's one of the aspects that has made Lovecraft so popular: the interpretation of his work. The problem then becomes that most people miss the mark when it comes to Eldritch horror because they focus on the monster instead of the underlying horror. Just a thought.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finishing The King in Yellow: The Prophets' Paradise

A Forgotten Legacy, Nonfiction

Review: Hostile Dimensions